Mainstreaming Torture

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 reopened what many people in the United States had long assumed was a settled ethical question: Is torture ever morally permissible? Within days, some began to suggest that, in these new circumstances, the new answer was “yes.” Mainstreaming Torture argues that September 11 did not, as some have said, “change everything.”

Rebecca Gordon

Institutionalized state torture remains as wrong today as it was on the day before those terrible attacks. Furthermore, U.S. practices during the “war on terror” are rooted in a history that began long before September 11, a history that includes both support for torture regimes abroad and the use of torture in American jails and prisons.

This is a book for anyone who cares about how institutionalized torture affects its victims, its practitioners, and the nation that gives it a home.

Philosophers, theologians, and political scientists may have a special interest in the book’s ethical argument: Most ethical views of torture miss the point, because they treat torture as  a series of isolated actions that arise in moments of extremity. In fact, institutionalized state torture is as an ongoing, historically and socially embedded practice.  Understanding torture this way reveals its implications for human virtue and flourishing.

An examination of torture’s effect on the four cardinal virtues—courage, temperance, justice, and practical wisdom—suggests specific ways in which each of these is deformed in a society that countenances torture.

Mainstreaming Torture concludes with the observation that if the United States is to come to terms with its involvement in institutionalized state torture, there must be a full and official accounting of what has been done, and those responsible at the highest levels must be held accountable.

Publishing details:

Kindle Edition available now

Hardcover: 240 pages
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA (May 6, 2014)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0199336431
ISBN-13: 978-0199336432

3 thoughts on “Mainstreaming Torture

  1. Yes, I agree: there should certainly be a full and thorough accounting of the U.S. torture programs but how can that happen in a political system that has so carefully and systematically eliminated all such legal mechanisms for that purpose (i.e. The Patriot Act)?

    In 2005 our church and parsonage was seized under a bogus court order for refusing to incorporate Christ (the church) under the state. My wife and I were arrested on criminal charges and lost everything we spent our lives working to acquire. Although we weren’t physically tortured, still, for many years thereafter the pain remained in so many ways.

    You cannot expect those who have the state’s power to torture other human being to suddenly see the error of their ways. All they are capable of understanding is the consequences of their actions. In other words… accountability. And while I certainly hope and play for it, I see no reason at this time to believe that (in this life) retribution will ever set in.

    Pastor William Raymond:

  2. I guess you already know the British history – best summarised in Ian Cobain’s Cruel Brittania – the British continuous use and training for torture since at least WWII – with the all services training centre now at Chicksands Bedfordshire – behind a political wall of implausible denial …
    and a deathly media silence looking the other way …

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s